Tag Archives: Tartan Day

A Toast to US National Tartan Day, 6 APRIL 2021

A video greeting

To introduce myself: I am Donald Maclaren of Maclaren, Chief of my clan and Convenor of the Standing Council of Scottish Chiefs.

The individual matters. And each person matters. And especially Scottish persons whether at home or (and I don’t use the word diaspora: it is not our word) those of Scottish descent overseas.

But there is something greater than ourselves and our individual identity. That is the identity that we derive from our origins, our kin and our ancestral lands. There is no more vibrant expression of that identity for us scots than our tartan. It defined us in battle. It defines us still today.

I imagine that there are some of us who don’t manage to wear the kilt every day. No doubt excuses can be made if you find yourself on the trading floor of wall street or if you are toiling in the vineyards in Oregon or a farmer in Oklahoma.  For all scots, however, the tartan is never far from our mind. And the importance of Tartan Day is that it keeps it proudly at the forefront.

On behalf of all the chiefs who are members of the Standing Council – both heads of clans and of families – I am honoured to send greetings on this special day. Our congratulations to the Scottish Coalition USA and the National Tartan Day Capitol committee and to all those involved in this very human celebration.

It is, after all, a celebration of the great kindred that we are part of. And of something even greater and more enduring than any one of us.

A toast to the tartan and to tartan day.

Two Declarations With A Common Purpose: The Link Between 1320 and 1776

By John King Bellassai*

We’ve just wrapped up another annual celebration of Tartan Day–observed each year on 6th April, the anniversary of the 1320 Declaration of Arbroath.  Parties and parades behind us for yet another year, it is only natural that we reflect on the significance of it all for those of us in the Ancestral Diaspora. This is especially timely, given that next year we will celebrate the 20th anniversary of the Tartan Day holiday, which has now firmly taken root in communities all across our land.  (As I’ve pointed out before, the real meaning of Tartan Day is contained in the plain wording of the standing resolutions of both houses of the U.S. Congress that authorize its observance:  To recognize and celebrate the many contributions of Scots, and Scottish-Americans, to the founding and subsequent development of the United States.)

Many of our Scottish cousins love to come over and help us celebrate Tartan Day, this year including the First Minister.  But they still tend to wince at the name (which we actually borrowed from the Canadians), as being romantically Victorian, maybe even a bit brigadoonish.   That is short-sighted on their part.  Even more than the thistle or the saltire, the tartan is a universally recognized symbol of the Scottish ‘brand’—not just something highland, but something quintessentially Scottish.  After all, it is well-documented that lowland ladies widely wore tartan shawls and wraps to protest the Union in the earliest days of the 18th century—a sentiment that many in modern Scotland seem to be embracing once more.  And a piece of simple tartan has even been found stuffed inside a clay pot, buried at the base of Hadrian’s Wall, wrapped around a fistful of 1st century Roman coins.  So tartan has been a commonly recognized symbol of “things Scottish” for a long, long time.  And here in America, 32 of our 50 states—typically states with heavy Scottish immigration in their respective histories–now have officially adopted their own tartans, registering them with the Scottish Tartans Authority.

The romance of the name “Tartan Day” aside, many, maybe most, in Scotland and even some here in America still pooh-pooh the claimed inspiration for our Tartan Day holiday being found in the Declaration of Arbroath. But should they so quickly dismiss the link?  I think not.  Much recent scholarship supports it, and an actual analysis of the structure of the two documents, even some striking similarities in phrasing, suggest that 1320 was indeed a powerful inspiration for 1776.  Not the only one, to be sure, but an important one, nonetheless.

The key to understanding the link between the two “declarations” lies in the fact that the American Revolution came right on the heels of the Scottish Enlightenment and that the works of many Scottish philosophers and academicians were being widely read, and deeply appreciated, in the American colonies in the decades immediately preceding our break with Britain.  Though all estimates tell us that Scots immigrants to the American colonies prior to 1776 made up less than 10 percent of the general population, their influence on the worldview held by the educated segment of the population was far out of proportion to their numbers.  Why so? 

The answer lies in the fact that 18th century Scots immigrants included many well-educated clergymen and graduates of Scottish universities—Edinburgh, Glasgow, and Aberdeen—the seats of the Enlightenment.  These two classes of immigrants, clergymen and university graduates, were well-acquainted with the works of Adam Ferguson, Francis Hutcheson, David Hume, Lord Kames and others that espoused the so-called “Common Sense Philosophy” then prevalent among the educated classes in Scotland.  Both at the grammar school level and in the majority of the six universities in the American colonies (four of which were founded by Scots), Scottish immigrants predominated in the teaching ranks; as a result, these Scottish Enlightenment works were widely read and debated among both faculty and students in America. 

We know that far from being an obscure document, the Declaration of Arbroath was well known  in Scotland in the years immediately preceding the adoption of the Treaty of Union in 1707, because it featured in the so-called “pamphlet wars” that swirled around that event.  Moreover, we know the Declaration of Arbroath itself went through at least four mass printings in Scotland in the decades between 1707 and 1776—showing that it was widely read and its sentiments appreciated.   But did this knowledge really cross the Atlantic?

In many ways, the key to understanding how the Scottish Declaration of Arbroath came to influence the American Declaration of Independence is to understand the relationship between William Small and Thomas Jefferson.  Small was born in Scotland in 1734 and emigrated to America in 1758, settling in Virginia, where he became a professor of rhetoric at the College of William & Mary in Williamsburgh.  But prior to emigrating, Small had attended Marischal College in Aberdeen, graduating in 1755.  And while a student there, he studied under William Duncan, Professor of Natural Philosophy, whose 1748 work, Elements of Logick–the dominant logic treatise of its time–waswidely read, both in Scotland and in America.  Jefferson studied under Small at William & Mary, graduating in 1761; through Small he became well acquainted with the work of Duncan. The two men, Jefferson and Small, remained life-long friends.  In his autobiography, Jefferson described Small as his mentor.    

In March of 1764, shortly after graduating from William & Mary, Jefferson purchased a copy of William Robertson’s The History of Scotland, which addressed in great detail the events of the Scottish wars of independence, culminating in the Declaration of Arbroath.  We also know that Jefferson’s mother’s family, the Randolphs, who numbered among the Virginia gentry, claimed descent from Thomas FitzRandolph, Early of Moray, nephew of King Robert the Bruce and himself a signer of the Declaration of Arbroath.  And we know that Jefferson was aware of this claimed descent on his mother’s side. Doubtless this purported connection with a signer of the Declaration of Arbroath affected Jefferson’s appreciation of the events of 1320.  A review of the catalog of his library at Monticello shows that Jefferson later owned works by almost all the great thinkers and writers of the Scottish Enlightenment, including Hutcheson, Hume, Ferguson, Kames, Adam Smith, and others—a life-long interest he kept.

The structural organization of the American Declaration of Independence is a logical syllogism and this suggests Jefferson was inspired by the logician and rhetorician Duncan, whose work was taught to Jefferson by Small.  Jefferson’s document conforms to the structure recommended by Duncan for conveying the maximum degree of conviction and certainty—a series of five propositions–(1) that all men are created equal; (2) that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; (3) that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness; (4) that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men; and (5) that when any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it.  This is followed in the Declaration of Independence by a so-called “self-evident” major premise: That when government becomes tyranny, men have a right to rebel against it.  This entire structure conforms carefully with Duncan’s rhetorical standards for proving any proposition, as contained in his 1748 treatise.

These facts aside, did the 1320 Declaration directly influence the 1776 Declaration?  Apart from both declarations being of similar length and signed by approximately the same number of “worthies” (39 bishops and nobles at Arbroath, 56 delegates at Philadelphia, appointed by the 13 colonies), many of the clauses in Jefferson’s declaration closely echo sentiments in the Declaration of Arbroath, even down to a similarity in many of the words used:   For example, both summon God to be their witness as to the rightness of their cause (the Scots calling him “the Supreme King and Judge”, the Americans calling him “the Supreme Judge of the World”).  Each contains a list of grievances against the tyrannical actions of a far-away English king as justification for them to take up arms.  Each declares that the assent of the governed is a key ingredient in the new political order it is advocating—for the Scottish people in 1320, to throw off the English yoke and choose their own king (The Bruce), from among their own citizens; for the Americans in 1776, to throw off the English yoke and set up a new form of self-government (a constitutional republic) by which to govern themselves.   And each says that if the new government does not meet the peoples’ expectations, they may change it, yet again.  Each says the freedoms for which they fight are meant to apply to all their citizens (the Scots listing “Jew and gentile alike”).  In each instance, the signers pledge to support and defend each other. And in each instance, the signers say they enter into this written compact for freedom alone, to which cause they pledge their lives and their sacred honor. 

Once drafted, Jefferson submitted his Declaration to the assembled members of the Continental Congress, which referred it to committee, where it was amended and finalized.  Two other prominent Scottish immigrants were among the members of that Continental Congress—John Witherspoon and James Wilson—and each argued forcefully for its passage in the debates which followed.  The Rev. John Witherspoon emigrated from East Lothian to New Jersey in 1768; James Wilson emigrated from Fife to Pennsylvania in 1765.  Both men were extremely well educated Scots and certainly knew of the Declaration of Arbroath, not only the wording itself but the history of its adoption. 

The first of the two, Witherspoon, was a Presbyterian minister—the only clergyman among the delegates—who had become President of the College of New Jersey (later renamed as Princeton University).  The second, Wilson, was an accomplished lawyer who went on to become an Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.   Drawing on their strong educational backgrounds as graduates of Scotland’s leading universities, both men contributed strong support to Jefferson’s Declaration.

Witherspoon, sixth President of the College of New Jersey (now Princeton), was educated at the Universities of St. Andrews and Edinburgh. He was ordained a minister in the Church of Scotland in 1745 and only emigrated to America after actively being urged to do so by Benjamin Rush, who visited Paisley expressly to recruit him behalf of the college.  During his 25 years in the job, Witherspoon transformed the small Presbyterian college, founded primarily to train clergymen, into the preeminent university in America.  A delegate from New Jersey to the Continental Congress and the only clergyman among them, Witherspoon actively served on over 100 committees and was the most outspoken among the delegates on behalf of full political separation from Britain.  Throughout his academic career, Witherspoon was an eloquent and outspoken proponent of the “Common Sense” Philosophy espoused by the Scottish Enlightenment scholars Hutcheson, Hume, Reid, Kames, and others, which he taught at Princeton.  

Witherspoon not only himself signed the Declaration of Independence, but in the decade preceding it, educated many of the first generation of political leaders in the new United States of America.  From among his students came 12 other members of the Continental Congress, each of whom signed the Declaration of Independence, plus one American President (James Madison), one American Vice President (Aaron Burr), 37 federal judges (three of whom later became U.S. Supreme Court justices), 28 later U.S. senators, and 49 later U.S. congressmen.  President John Adams once said of Witherspoon, “I know of no character, alive or dead, who has done more real good for America.”

Wilson, known in America as “James of Caledonia”, was also a delegate to the first Continental Congress, but from Pennsylvania. He had attended the universities of Glasgow, St. Andrews and Edinburgh before emigrating and thus was equally well read in the works of the Scottish Enlightenment as were William Small and John Witherspoon.  Imbued with the ideas of the Scottish Enlightenment, he moved to Philadelphia in 1766, to begin teaching at the College of Philadelphia (now the University of Pennsylvania), which awarded him an honorary Master of Arts degree.  Wilson began to read the law at the office of John Dickinson a short time later; after two years of study he joined the bar in Philadelphia, setting up his own practice in nearby Reading, Pennsylvania in 1767.  Wilson was very highly regarded by George Washington, who in his memoirs praised Wilson’s abilities and temperament.  A leading legal theorist in colonial America, he was one of the six original justices appointed by President Washington to the U.S. Supreme Court shortly after the Constitution was adopted in 1789.

One of only six men to sign both the Declaration of Independence in 1776 and the Constitution in 1789, Wilson contributed greatly to the constitutional debates of the 1780’s which led to the formulation of the modern American tri-partite political system, consisting of co-equal executive, legislative and judicial branches, as embodied in the U.S. Constitution.  And it was Wilson who convinced Congress to directly state that all powers of government, any government, are ultimately derived from the people—a characteristically Scottish notion and one which had been clearly articulated by the Scots in the Declaration of Arbroath in 1320.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

[This article appears in abbreviated form in the current issue of Scots Heritage Magazine.  It is reprinted here in its entirety with the permission of the editors of that publication.]

* John King Bellassai is President of the Council of Scottish Clans & Associations (COSCA) and Vice President of the National Capital Tartan Day Committee.  (His maternal grandfather, John King, after whom he is named, emigrated from Killearn, in Stirlingshire, to America in 1910.)

TARTAN DAY SPEECH 2017, By Viscount Dunrossil


As always, it is a pleasure and a privilege to be here, as we celebrate National Tartan Day and honor in particular those Scots who died here at the Alamo.

My first task is to bring you greetings from various people who do not have the opportunity to be here with you in person.

First, FROM the people of the (still) United Kingdom including SCOTLAND: these are momentous times across the water. This week the British Government formally notified the EU that it is withdrawing from the Union. Brexit has begun. Also this week the Scottish Parliament voted in favor of holding a second Independence Referendum, known locally as INDYREF2. This is certainly a time, as well as an appropriate place, to reflect on the meaning of nationhood, sovereignty and independence.

Secondly, I would like to bring you greetings from the Standing Council of Scottish Chiefs and the Council of Scottish Clans and Associations, COSCA: If you’re here for this event and for the Games which follow it, you understand that Scots in the Diaspora tend to identify with the mother country through the medium of clan and family, and both SCSC and COSCA are there to assist you as you explore that relationship. It operates at a level below that of nationalism, but for all that, the love and loyalty it inspires is just as strong, and if anything, somewhat purer and less complicated.

Third, I bring you greetings from the Society of Scottish Armigers and the Court of the Lord Lyon. The Society, of which I am currently the chair and Lord Lyon the President, exists partly to serve as a resource to help Games and individual enthusiasts “get it right” on matters of form and protocol. This Lyon in particular has a long experience with, and a love for, America: he studied for his doctorate in canon law at Georgetown and served for a year as a priest in Iowa. He has made it known that he is keen to encourage more worthy Americans to apply for arms. While this can be a very satisfying accomplishment for an individual and his family, it can be particularly important for clans with no chief: the route to getting a chief, and so to representation on the SCSC, is first to get a set of armigers, who can hold a clan convention.

Finally I want to mention a new organization, GAELICusa.org. The initial goal of Gaelicusa.org is to raise the funds needed to pay for a Visiting Lectureship in Scottish Gaelic Studies at UNC Chapel Hill for the 2018-19 academic year. The University will advertise and fill the position according to the standard, competitive bidding process. I wholeheartedly recommend this to you. There are chairs at American universities in almost every conceivable hyphenated American studies, but not in Gaelic American studies. This is long overdue. As we are here to celebrate and remind ourselves this evening, Scots have contributed as much as any national group to this country, and more than most.

Scholarship matters. It brings the past to life and gives us a lens through which to view and understand the present.

When I first read about the Alamo, the comparison which came to mind was with the heroic stand by Spartan hoplites at Thermopylae in 480 BC, an always doomed stand by heavily outnumbered troops, which dented the morale of the invaders and gave their own side precious time to organize an eventually successful resistance.

But that is not how the defenders themselves understood their action. The historical precedent, which mattered and motivated them, was the struggle for Scottish Independence in the early fourteenth century. The chain that joins these two wars for self-determination, over five hundred years apart, has three crucial links, which Texan historians all too often neglect.

They are national origin, Bannockburn and Arbroath.

First national origin: the displays in the Alamo shrine contain the flags of many states from which the defenders most directly came to Texas. What they obscure is the fact that, as Carl Peterson pointed out, over 80% of them shared a single national origin: they were Scots. And these Scots knew their Scottish history and Scottish literature, especially the poetry of Burns.

Austin, Dallas and Houston are all Scottish names, and while it’s fair to say that the Spanish played a major role in Texas history as the first European settlers, it’s also true that without the Scots, Texas (and for that matter other states like New Mexico and Colorado), would still be part of Mexico today, and America would probably never have become a major power on the world stage.

Second, Bannockburn. This was the great victory in 1314 by Robert the Bruce over King Edward II which played a great part in securing Scottish independence. When I was young, before Flower of Scotland was penned, the anthem Scots used to annoy the English was popularly known as Scots Wha Hae, which Burns wrote in 1793, some forty years before the Alamo, but long enough for the song to have traveled the world. It is also sometimes known by the subtitle, ‘Bruce addresses the troops before Bannockburn’. We believe that this was sung and played every night by the defenders, who saw themselves reliving the struggle of Bruce and his men. Both Scots and Texans faced an enemy with superior numbers led by an autocratic ruler with a better legal claim to the land, who had crossed their southern border and now stood ready for battle. When the defenders wanted to appeal for reinforcements, they sent out a poster entitled “Now’s the day and now’s the hour,” a quotation from the poem. And when the scout rode out with their desperate last appeal he added that the defenders were determined to “do or die,” another quotation from the poem.

If Bannockburn and Burns were the inspiration for the Scots who fought and died here at the Alamo, it is only fitting that modern day Scots come here each year to honor them.

Today, or technically April 6, is now known in this country as National Tartan Day. The date was chosen because on April 6 1320, six years after Bannockburn, Scots signed the Declaration of Arbroath, which has been called the first, seminal declaration of Independence, and the inspiration, directly or indirectly, for all subsequent declarations. What Arbroath asserted was essentially three things, which bear repeating today, but which were quite novel at the time:

  1. Ultimate sovereignty lies with the people, who retain the right to replace rulers who do not honor their wishes.
  2. There is an essential principle of freedom and national self-determination
  3. And you can expect that no-one (certainly no Scotsman) will surrender this freedom while they have life and breath.

The Alamo defenders were Scots who saw themselves as reenacting the battle of Bannockburn, inspired by the message of freedom and self-determination first expressed in the Declaration of Arbroath. “That which no man surrenders but with his life.” They did indeed give up their lives that day. But their cause prevailed. And it is our promise that their sacrifice, and the events and songs that inspired them, will never be forgotten.

Andrew Dunrossil, 2017